Coleman v. Frazer
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 81 — PETITION EQUITY — APPEAL FROM KEETON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 4 jD.ana, 348; Hunt vs. Weir. 2 B. Mon., 74; Watson vs. Watson’s heirs. 2B. Mon., 79; Reed’s Will. 4 Mei., 163 ; Scchrist vs. Edwards. 2 J. J. Marshall, 240 ; Elliott’s Will, 2 J. J. 'M., 331; McDaniel’s Will. 1 B. Mon., 353; Harrison’s Will. Story’s Eg.
Read the full summary
CASE 81 — PETITION EQUITY — APPEAL FROM KEETON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 4 jD.ana, 348; Hunt vs. Weir. 2 B. Mon., 74; Watson vs. Watson’s heirs. 2B. Mon., 79; Reed’s Will. 4 Mei., 163 ; Scchrist vs. Edwards. 2 J. J. Marshall, 240 ; Elliott’s Will, 2 J. J. 'M., 331; McDaniel’s Will. 1 B. Mon., 353; Harrison’s Will. Story’s Eg. Jurisprudence, sec. 64e. 5 Modern, 368; Ellis vs. Ellis. 10 lb., 67 ; 1 Salk., 387. 5 Esp., 28 ; Clarice vs. Leslie. 1 Dcnio, 460 ; Randall vs. Sweet. 10 Cush., 436; Swift vs. Bennett. 7 N. H., 368 ; Conn vs. Coburn. 2 Hill (S. C.), 400; Haine vs. Tarrant. 1 P. Wms., 558. 2…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HARDIN
dei.ivebed the opinion op the codkt:
On the second day of October, 1860, Elizabeth Phile, as the assignee of Cambrón & Fisk and Menzies & Prj'or, filed her petition against William Frazer, B. F. Sandford, and Peter Reed, on their promissory note for three hundred dollars. Subsequently, the plaintiff, by an amended petition, exhibited another note of three hundred dollars, *303given by said defendants to said Cambrón & Fisk and Menzies & Pryor, and assigned by them to the plaintiff, and sought the foreclosure of a mortgage made by William Frazer in September, 1858, of a tract of land to…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Vance v. AthertonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Berry v. StigallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Rath's Committee v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Dalton's Committee v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Eastern State Hospital v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.