Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

J. Michael Teets, Comm. v. Wendy J. Miller

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2016No. 14-1118Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenjamin, Justice

In the more than forty years since the initial 1975 enactment of the Open Governmental Proceedings Act (the “Act”), we have never exempted .an entire field of government regulation from its purview. No matter how controversial the subject matter or how politically charged the atmosphere surrounding the decision-making process, we have always adhered to the Legislature’s admonition that “[t]he people in delegating authority do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for them to know and what is not good for them to know.” W. Va. Code § Í3-9A-1 (1999). The principle that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rhodes v. Malden Public Service DistrictWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API