Legal Opinion

Southern Glove Manufacturing Co. v. City of Newton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1985No. 8425SC966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The petitioners contend the area which the City of Newton proposes to annex does not meet the requirements of G.S. 160A-48 which provides in part:(a) A municipal governing board may extend the municipal corporate limits to include any area(2) Every part of which meets the requirements of either subsection (c) or subsection (d).(c) Part or all of the area to be annexed must be developed for urban purposes. An area developed for urban purposes is defined as any area which meets any one of the following standards:(3) Is so developed that at least sixty percent (60%) of the total…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. HookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. In re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Chapel Hill Country Club, Inc. v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Wallace v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API