Drew v. Hicks
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, San Bernardino County; John L. Campbell, Judge. Action by H. L. Drew and C. W. Fairbanks against Sarah A. Hicks and William Curtis to enjoin defendants from constructing a bulkhead so as to turn water on plaintiffs-’ premises. From judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Appeal from the judgment and an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
*441This case and the case of Drew v. Cole (No. 19,143, filed February 4, 1893, 3 Cal. Unrep. 765, 32 Pac. 229), were tried together in superior court and decided upon the same evidence. In Drew v. Cole, findings and judgment were for defendants, and upon appeal the judgment was affirmed, and a petition for rehearing denied. For a description of the premises of the respective parties, and a general statement of the facts involved, see Drew v. Cole, supra.
The complaint in Drew v. Cole was filed October 14,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Mills v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Ogburn v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Richards v. DowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. First Nat. BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- Hardman v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Garmany v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929