Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Nashville Grain Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1913No. 4342Published

Action on contract; from city court of Atlanta—Judge Beid. June 15, 1912.

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, O. J.

1. Where one who was sued for breach of contract sought to avoid the contract entirely by setting up that it was altered by the plaintiff in a material part, it was proper for the court to charge that if the alteration was made unintentionally, or without any intention to defraud, it would not render void the contract as originally made; and that if the plaintiff was otherwise entitled to recover, he could still recover on the contract as it stood before the change was made, if the original contract could be discovered and was capable of execution. Civil Code (1910), § 4296; Lowry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Vinegar Co. v. Carter & FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Shirley v. SwaffordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Burch v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Southern Flour & Grain Co. v. Saint Louis Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Gwin v. Anderson & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API