Legal Opinion

State v. Geddeda

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 21, 2021No. A172261PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

440 Submitted January 29; portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay attorney fees reversed, otherwise affirmed July 21, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KALIFA RAMADAM GEDDEDA, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 19CR17230; A172261

493 P3d 1112

In this criminal appeal, defendant seeks reversal of the trial court’s impo- sition of attorney fees on the ground that there was insufficient evidence to find that he “is or may be able to pay” them. Held: Neither defendant’s security-release agreement nor defendant’s vague prospect of employment was sufficient to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. PendergraphtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. KanuchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Lopez-MoralesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. State v. DunhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API