Legal Opinion

United States v. Maurice Fred Alves

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 8, 1989No. 88-1752PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

In this sentencing guidelines case, we must decide an issue of first impression: is a career offender entitled to a two-point reduction for acceptance of responsibility for his criminal conduct from the sentencing levels set for a career offender. 1 The district court held “that a career offender is not entitled to the acceptance of responsibility for a two point deduction.” For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I. FACTS

Maurice Fred Alves, defendant-appellant, was indicted on five counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Count one was dropped, for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Jose Rafael Perez-FrancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Larry C. HavenerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Alfred Ruiz-Garcia, A/K/A Wilfredo Cintron Delgado, A/K/A Wilfredo CintronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Louis SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Joe Alfred Thomas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Louis CruzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API