Legal Opinion

Emily Nanouk v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 4, 2020No. 19-35116PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EMILY NANOUK, No. 19-35116 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-00221-RRB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 4, 2020 Anchorage, Alaska Filed September 4, 2020 Before: Morgan Christen, Paul J. Watford, and Bridget S. Bade, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Watford 2 NANOUK V. UNITED STATES SUMMARY * Federal Tort Claims Act The panel vacated the district court’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Lorrin Whisnant, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Phong Lam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. A.I.I.L. v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  3. Alexa D. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026
  4. Anthony v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  5. Feindt v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2024

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API