Legal Opinion
Soltau v. Goodyear Vulcanite Co.
New York Court of Common Pleas
Decided April 1, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Action by Olga J. C. Soltau, as administratrix of Robert Soltau, deceased, against the Goodyear Vulcanite Company. There was a verdict in-favor of plaintiff, and defendant moves for a new trial, on exceptions ordered to be heard at general term in the first instance.
1Opinion of the CourtBisghoff, J.
The plaintiff’s cause of action was admitted by the pleadings, and the issue upon the trial was confined to the defendant’s counterclaim for breach of a certain contract for the sale of goods to the defendant by plaintiff’s intestate, Robert Soltau.
The contract was as follows:
“New York, May 19th, 1892.
“Sold to the Goodyear Vulcanite Co., for account of Mr. Robert Soltau, 10 tons (about-22,000 lbs.) G. S. Borneo rubber, of the usual grade of this mark, at 29% c. per lb., net cash, payable half on August 2,1892, and half on Sept. 2,1892; rubber to be delivered, half during last half of June,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lawrence v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Eddy v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- The People v. . Bank of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Shaw v. . Republic Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Gallagher v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Broom & Brush Co. v. AddickesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
- E. T. Burrowes Co. v. Rapid Safety Filter Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
- Gleason v. ThomAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896