Legal Opinion · Dissent
Pollock v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 1923No. 4 Div. 747Published
1Dissent
Eliminating the counts in the indictment that were either nol. prossed or eliminated by the verdict of the jury, the defendant stands convicted upon two counts as follows:
"The grand jury of said county charge that before the finding of this indictment that George D. Pollock, being at the time an agent or an officer of the Peanut Products Corporation, a corporation, and while acting as such agent or officer in the sale or offer to sell certificate or certificates of the capital stock of the Peanut Products Corporation to one J.B. Martin, did falsely pretend to the said J.B. Martin, with intent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Addington v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
- Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Beasley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Meek v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Clark v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.