Legal Opinion
Matherly v. Matherly
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1983No. 2-1181A375PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIVARNIK, Justice.
This cause comes to us on a petition to transfer from the Second District Court of Appeals. Said petition is brought by Respondent-Appellee Morris Matherly following the Second District's holding that the trial judge did not have jurisdiction to correct an enforcing order issued after the trial court's entry of a dissolution decree.
The facts show that Judith and Morris Matherly were married three years when Judith filed her petition for dissolution in January, 1979. After a trial and by decree dated July 10, 1979, the trial court divided the property of the parties. Included…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blichert v. BrososkyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Crawfordsville v. ColingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Associates Financial Services Co. of Kentucky v. KnappIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Toller v. TollerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fairfield v. FairfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of Estate of BankoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rogers v. National City Bank of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992