Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fong, Auditor v. Sapienza, Judge

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1951No. 2854Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

LE BARON, J.

I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion holds that mandamus lies in this case to compel an inferior court not only to reverse a decision made by it in the exercise of its legitimate jurisdiction but to enter a new decision and to direct it to exercise with respect thereto judicial discretion in a particular manner differently from that in which it has already exercised discretion. Such a holding violates the essential purpose of mandamus, which is purely mandatory, and I find no authority to support it.

The authoritative holdings of this court are to the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. People ex rel. Oebricks v. Superior CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  5. Ex Parte Railway CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1881

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API