Fong, Auditor v. Sapienza, Judge
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
LE BARON, J.
I respectfully dissent. The majority opinion holds that mandamus lies in this case to compel an inferior court not only to reverse a decision made by it in the exercise of its legitimate jurisdiction but to enter a new decision and to direct it to exercise with respect thereto judicial discretion in a particular manner differently from that in which it has already exercised discretion. Such a holding violates the essential purpose of mandamus, which is purely mandatory, and I find no authority to support it.
The authoritative holdings of this court are to the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- People ex rel. Oebricks v. Superior CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Ex Parte Railway CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.