Legal Opinion

Scott v. Dyno Nobel, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided August 31, 2022No. 4:16-cv-01440Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TEDDY SCOTT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:16CV1440 HEA ) DYNO NOBEL, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Dyno Nobel’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or in the Alternative, for a New Trial [Doc. No. 476]. Plaintiffs oppose the Motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be denied. Background Plaintiff Teddy Scott (“Scott”), a worker at a neighboring facility, and his wife, Melanie Scott (“Melanie”), brought this…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API