Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Flax

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 5, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

The defendant was before the Superior Court on appeal from a finding of guilty in the Municipal Court *120of the City of Boston, on a complaint alleging in substance the violation of certain street traffic regulations of the board of street commissioners, to wit, refusing to place an automobile as directed by a police officer. He was also found guilty in the Superior Court, and the case is here on exceptions taken to the refusal of the trial judge to grant certain requests for rulings.

St. 1908, c. 447, § 1, authorizes the street commissioners “to pass” regulations relative to street traffic in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lorain Steel Co. v. Norfolk & Bristol Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Field v. GoodingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Wheelwright v. Tax CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Proprietors of Mills on Monatiquot River v. Inhabitants of Randolph, Holbrook, & BraintreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Burnham v. Mayor & Aldermen of BeverlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Doggett v. HooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Spellman v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API