Legal Opinion

Simas Floor Co. v. Tysen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1983No. 14245PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*692OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment in a contract dispute. The sole issue presented is whether the district court committed reversible error in awarding attorney’s fees to the defendant below, respondent Tysen. We conclude that the district court did not commit reversible error, and we therefore affirm the award of attorney’s fees.

Appellant (“Simas”), plaintiff below, filed a complaint against Tysen, alleging that Tysen had failed to pay Simas for certain services rendered by Simas. Simas specifically alleged that Tysen had agreed to pay $5,383.50 for these services, and prayed for…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peacock Jewelers, Inc. v. Nevada State BankNevada Supreme Court · 1976

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. NocillaNevada Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API