Legal Opinion

Rowles v. Hadden

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1919No. 932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Pecos County; Jas. Cornell, Judge. Suit by Dill V. Rowles against W. A. Had-den, trustee, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

Dill V. Rowles brought this suit against W. A. Hadden, trustee, John Rooney, John Odom, Dan Bihl, James Rooney, and F. S. Wilson, on what is called in the pleading a permanent water right contract providing for the furnishing of water for purposes of irrigation for lands for farming purposes from an irrigation system owned and operated by appellees.

The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition. Appellant declining to amend, judgment was entered dismissing the suit at appellant’s cost. Appellant here complains of the ruling of the district judge sustaining the general demurrer.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beham v. GhioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Beal's Adm'r v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Cockrell v. Houston Packing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cockrell v. Houston Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ross & Sensibaugh v. McLellandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Wineinger v. Farmers' & Stockmen's Loan & Investment Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Kent v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Thomas v. Abernathy County Line Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Security Union Casualty Co. v. M. & v. Tank Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API