Legal Opinion

United States v. Ifemmuta C. Adirika

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 3, 2017No. 15-14243; 15-14315UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Antonio Richard and Ifem-muta Adirika appeal their convictions and sentences. A jury found both defendants guilty of possession and conspiracy to distribute Oxycodone, a controlled substance. The district court sentenced Richard and Adirika to 36 and 40 months’ imprisonment, respectively.

On appeal, the defendants jointly raise three main issues. First, the defendants argue entrapment. They claim that the government failed to present sufficient evidence that they were predisposed to commit their offenses prior to the involvement of a confidential government…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krizek v. Queens Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
  2. United States of America v. University of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API