Legal Opinion
Carr v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided April 22, 1976PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert A. Posner, J.
This is an action in the amount of $2,108.31 for alleged breach of contract between an insurer and its insured. The plaintiff carried a policy of automobile insurance with the defendant. The policy carried statutory no-fault benefits (as required under article XVIII of the Insurance Law). In addition, for an extra premium (exact amount of the premium not being contained in the submitted set of facts stipulated by the parties), the defendant also sold to the plaintiff automobile medical payments coverage in the principal sum of $5,000.
The medical expense part of the policy stated as follows:…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Sincoff v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Whittle v. Government Employees InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1966
- Ben Pulitzer Creations, Inc. v. Phoenix InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Karnette v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987