Legal Opinion

Sentell v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1933No. 4408Published

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant for the damage done cotton loaded on cars of defendant, spotted at plaintiff’s gin. An exception of no cause or right of action was filed by defendant, based on the failure of the petition to allege a legal delivery of the cotton to defendant. The exception of no cause of action alone was sustained, which in effect overrules the exception of no right of action.

After the dismissal of this action, plaintiff filed a second suit supplementing the allegations of the first petition by adding aver-ments to the effect that custom between the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Laenger v. LaengerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. Banahan v. SvarvaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Ducre v. MilnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API