Legal Opinion

Gassel v. Franjac

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1961No. Docket 52, Calendar 48,841Published

1Per curiam

This bill for specific performance was met by a cross bill for foreclosure. The con troversy stems from inability of tbe plaintiff vendees to comply with, tbe payment schedule set forth in a land contract for sale to them, by defendants, of certain acreage plaintiffs intended to develop as a residential subdivision, and from disputes, arising after the contract had been executed, over a claimed and denied agreement modifying the originally agreed payment terms. * In só many words plaintiffs claim that, by subsequent acts and understandings of the parties, defendants agreed to receive payments…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lacney v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API