Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. McLoughlin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1878PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Lapeer. Assumpsit. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMaeston, J.

This action was commenced in justice’s court. The first error assigned relates to the sufficiency of the declaration. The justice in his return set forth *481that “the plaintiff declared verbally against said defendants on common counts in assumpsit, and also on a breach of a written contract, now on file in court, in all for three hundred dollars or under.” The defendants pleaded the general issue.

We are of opinion that under the liberal rules of pleading applicable to, and which have long been practiced in justice’s courts, the declaration was sufficient, and that the contract referred to was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Applebaum v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Lynch v. CraneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Wilcox v. Toledo & Ann Arbor R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Densmore v. MathewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API