Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Hoffman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendants from judgment of the Fourth District Court. n

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action is by the plaintiffs to recover for professional services rendered for the defendants in examining a title to certain real estate. The bill was $128.12, on account of which the defendants paid $60, and for the balance remaining unpaid, $68.12, gave a note made by the defendant Joseph A. Hoffman, and indorsed by the defendant Emma Hoffman, dated May 5, 1896, and payable one month after date, at Ho. 39 Avenue A/

*226The plaintiffs accepted the note, and on the 10th of July, 1896, -brought this action to recover the balance due on their bill. The note was never presented for payment, but…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jagger Iron Co. v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Cary v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Becker v. . BoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Hills v. . PlaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Carroll v. . SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fallon v. FarberAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API