Legal Opinion

Miller v. Hart-Parr Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Floyd District Court. — Hon. C. H. Kelley, Judge. Action for damages based upon alleged negligence of the defendant.’ The trial court directed a verdict for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtWithrow, J.

I. The plaintiff, William Miller, was in .1910 in the employ of the defendant as a yardman about its factory and had been so employed for a period of four or five weeks prior to the time of receiving the injuries complained of in the action, which were sustained by him on September 22d. He was a man thirty-four years of age and, upon entering the employ of the defendant, gave his occupation as an engineer. He had previously been employed in various ways, sometimes running a stationary engine, did some carpenter work, assisted in threshing and like labor, without regular occupation or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Newbury ex rel. Newbury v. Getchel & Martin Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. O'Connor v. Chicago, Rock Island, & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Breen v. Iowa Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. Paulson v. Bettendorf Axle Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Olson v. Hanford Produce Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Hall v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Adams v. Albina Engine WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API