Legal Opinion
Van Wye v. Robbins
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1941No. Civ. 13329PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover damages resulting from personal injuries, defendant Al Robbins appeals.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff (respondent), the essential facts are these:
March 18, 1940, plaintiff parked his automobile in a service station operated by Sidney Smilo, which service station was adjacent to the market building of the Bi-Rite Market operated by defendant A1 Robbins. In April of 1939 Mr. Robbins had entered into an oral agreement with Mr. Smilo whereby the customers…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Beaulac v. RobieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- Frear v. Manchester Traction, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Stoddard v. Roberts Public Markets, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnston v. De La Guerra Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946
- Harris v. JoffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Oldenburg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. KindtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Nevarez v. Thriftimart, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.