Legal Opinion
Sigler v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 1941No. 3364PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.
The E. 0. Handy Co. operated under a real estate broker’s license issued January 2, 1936,' and Landon J. Sigler, appellant, being duly licensed as a real estate salesman of said broker, earned cer tain commissions arising out of such relationship, which came into the hands of the broker because of such relationship, and were not paid to Sigler. Sigler later recovered a judgment therefor against said broker.
During such relationship there-was in force a bond of the broker, signed by the appellee, The Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Co., as required by provisions of the law of Ohio (Section…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Eberman v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Cannon v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Century Indemnity Co. v. Maryland ex rel. Sigler & Megary, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- National Surety Corporation v. KneelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Phoenix Assurance Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.