Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Choolokian v. Mission of the Immaculate Virgin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In these habeas corpus proceedings there was ample evidence to sustain the findings of the trial court, unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, that the relator was not fit, competent or able to care for his children and that it would not be to their best interests to be taken by him to Armenia. (See Finlay v. Finlay, 240 N. Y. 429.) The dismissal of the writs of habeas corpus herein should therefore be affirmed, but insofar as the final order below imposed conditions upon relator’s right to make further application or seek new writs of habeas corpus, it should be modified so as to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Presutti v. PresuttiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. People ex rel. Djurovic v. DjurovicNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People ex rel. Anonymous v. Talbot Perkins Adoption ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Y. v. Y.New York City Family Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API