Legal Opinion

Moore v. Moore

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 21, 1922No. 13706PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; Harve L. Melton, Judge. Action by Sampson Moore against Lizzie Moore for divorce. From order allowing plaintiff alimony and attorneys fees pen-dente lite, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.

Sampson Moore, plaintiff, commenced this action in the district court of Pittsburg county on May 27, 1922, to obtain a decree of divorce from Lizzie Moore, defendant.

Thereafter, on 'the 8th day of August, 1922, the plaintiff presented to the court an application for allowance for attorneys’ fees, suit money, and for support pending determination of the action. The court, after hearing the application, made an order for the defendant to pay the plaintiff attorneys’ fees in the sum of $250, suit money in the sum of $100, and $50 per month during the pendency of the action; and decreed the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Blackaby v. Cullison, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Willbrook v. WortenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Elliott v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Redcorn v. District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Nuckolls v. NuckollsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API