Legal Opinion

Lib v. University of Missouri

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1977No. 76-1656Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied by an evenly divided court.

GIBSON, Chief Judge,

joined by HENLEY, Circuit Judge, files the following statement in regard to the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc:

*860GIBSON, Chief Judge.

I dissent from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. In my opinion, Fed. R.Civ.P. 52 has been misapplied in this case and the District Court’s findings of fact, which are supported by the record, have been improperly displaced by appellate findings of fact.

The divided panel opinion seems to hold that the “clearly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Healy v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Anders Jahre, Defendants-Third-Party Volkswagenwerk A. G., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  5. Gay Alliance of Students v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API