Legal Opinion

Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1996No. S95G1887PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

This is the second appearance of this case in this Court. In Banks v. ICI Americas, 264 Ga. 732 (450 SE2d 671) (1994) (hereinafter “Banks /”), we adopted a risk-utility analysis as the appropriate test for reaching the legal conclusion that a product’s design specifications were partly or totally defective. Id. at (1). We further concluded that plaintiffs1 were entitled to a new trial on their defective design claim against defendant ICI Americas2 and remanded the case to the Court of Appeals with direction that a new trial be granted unless such was precluded by that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Banks v. ICI Americas, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  5. General Motors Corp. v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Findley v. FindleySupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  4. Swicegood v. Pliva, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
  5. Jones v. Amazing Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API