Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arkell Safety Bag Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 22, 1936No. 3916Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

GaRREtt, Judge:

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers in In re Megroz, Portier, Magny & Go., upon which great reliance seems to be placed by the majority, it having been affirmed by a United States Circuit Court, was rendered June 30, 1891. The case arose under the 1890 tariff act. Since that time numerous and fundamental changes have been made in succeeding tariff acts with reference to the appraisement of merchandise and the relation of the tribunals of the United States Board of General Appraisers (now the United States Customs Court) thereto. See United States…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. McConnaughey & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. Von OefeleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Tower & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API