Jacobs-Raak v. Raak

YandeWalle, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Daniel Raak appealed and Danel Jaeobs-Raak, now known as Danel Jacobs, cross-appealed from a divorce judgment *774distributing their marital property and ordering Raak to pay child support. Except with regard to the division of the mineral estate, we conclude the district court did not err as a matter of law, did not abuse its discretion, and its findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for an identical division of the mineral interest or, in the alternative, further explanation concerning the division of the mineral…