Legal Opinion
SpaceTime3D, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided December 7, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00372Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION § SPACETIME3D, INC. § § Plaintiff, § v. § Case No. 2:19-cv-00372-JRG § SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., § SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, § INC., § § CLAIM CONSTRUCTION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On October 21, 2020, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms within in United States Patent Nos. 8,881,048 (“the ’048 Patent”); 9,304,654 (“the ’654 Patent”); and 9,696,868 (“the ’868 Patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Patents”). Having reviewed the arguments made by the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.