Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Houston v. Shilling

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1951No. A-3069Published

1DissentJustice Smedley

I respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority, because it subjects petitioner, the City of Houston, to liability for injuries suffered by respondent as the result of the negligence of an employee of the city while engaged in the performance of a governmental function of the city.

Respondent was injured in a collision between her automobile and a truck owned and operated by the city in the collection *393of garbage. This brings the case under City of Fort Worth v. George, 108 S. W. 2d 929. And, as stated in substance in the opinion of the majority, the refusal of the application for writ…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. QuinonesTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Dallas v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Braun v. Trustees of Victoria Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Kemp Hotel Operating Co. v. City of Wichita FallsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  5. City of Port Arthur v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API