Legal Opinion

Uhlfelder v. Weinshall

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael D. Stallman, J.

Motion sequence numbers 001 and 003 are consolidated herein for disposition.

Plaintiffs challenge inter alia the constitutionality of Local Law 64 (Local Law No. 64 [2003] of City of New York, Int 569-A), which amends the Administrative Code of the City of New York in relation to the ownership, installation and maintenance of, and placement of advertisements on newsstands.1 Newsstand structures are currently owned by persons who hold licenses to operate them. Under Local Law 64, newsstands will be owned under a single franchise which will rebuild and…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Uhlfelder v. WeinshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Gangemi v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Uhlfelder v. WeinshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API