Legal Opinion

Oregon v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 7, 2026No. 26-01472 26-01606Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 26-47 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE THE STATE OF OREGON, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Claire R. Kelly, and Timothy C. Stanceu, Judges v. Court No. 26-01472-3JP UNITED STATES, ET AL., Defendants. BURLAP AND BARREL, INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Claire R. Kelly, v. and Timothy C. Stanceu, Judges UNITED STATES, ET AL., Court No. 26-01606-3JP Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER [Granting Plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment and entering a permanent injunction for The State of Washington, Burlap and Barrel, Inc., and Basic Fun, Inc.;…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API