Legal Opinion

Borland v. Zittlosen

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 30, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This libel was filed to recover a bill of $1,441.77 for supplies furnished by the libelant to the ship Zephyr in June, 1883. The proof shows that the registered owners were the defendants Zittlosen, Springier, and Booth; but that Booth was a mere nominal owner, holding his interest for the benefit of the defendant Kruger, a prior registered owner, in-whose interest the voyages continued to be made as before; that Zittlosen was ship’s husband and general agent of the vessel in New York; and that Booth took no part and had no beneficial interest in her navigation. The amount of the supplies was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Muldon v. WhitlockNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  2. MacY v. . WheelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Stedman v. . FeidlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Belle of the SeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Binewicz v. HaglinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Johnson, Joseph & G. M. Josselyn & Co. v. GoodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. In re KaldenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API