Legal Opinion

City of Melbourne v. Billingsley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 13, 1947No. 4-8154PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Griffist Smith, Chief Justice.

It is conceded that if Melbourne is a City of the Second Class, its unanimous vote of October 8, 1946, in favor of issuing waterworks improvement bonds under authority of Amendment No. 13 to the Constitution is valid. The question is, Was Melbourne a City of the Second Class, or an Incorporated Town?

The municipality’s demurrer makes these admissions : Melbourne was an Incorporated Town until March 1937. Under Ordinance No. 9 a proposal for classification as a City of the Sefcond Class was submitted to the voters. By a majority of more than eight to one the higher…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Steele v. GannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Gentry v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Foster v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. DuLaney v. Continental Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  5. Crowe v. Security Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duncan Parking Meter Corp. v. City of GurdonDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API