Legal Opinion
United States v. Phillip Bradley Sadler
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 25, 2017No. 16-3946PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), the district court 1 resentenced Phillip Bradley Sadler to an above-Guidelines range sentence of 102 months’ imprisonment for being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, Sadler argues that the district court considered an improper sentencing factor when it commented that'although “Sadler does not technically qualify as an armed career criminal, ... he is exactly the type of defendant that Congress had in mind when it passed the [Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA)].” We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- United States v. SaddlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. RoundtreeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Darryl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Gabriel AyresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Kevin MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Ahnna HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Darryl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.