Legal Opinion

State v. Dingfelder

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1973No. 43475Published

1Per curiam

We hold, in affirming defendant’s conviction for aggravated rape, Minn. St. 609.291, that there was sufficient credible evidence to sustain the conviction and that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying defendant’s pretrial motion for a change of venue or in admitting photographs of the victim, taken 2 days after the incident, which showed the bruised condition of her body.

With respect to the first issue, we rely on, among other cases, State v. McGlynn, 292 Minn. 405, 195 N. W. 2d 583 (1972); State v. Whelan, 291 Minn. 83, 189 N. W. 2d 170 (1971); State v. Artez, 286 Minn.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. State v. TinklenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. State v. McGlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. State v. DimlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. State v. AnnisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API