Legal Opinion
Application of Waterfront Comm. of NY Harbor
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 3, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
39 N.J. Super. 33 (1956)
120 A.2d 504
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR TO PUNISH FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A SUBPOENA FRANK MURRAY AND JAMES CALABRESE.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided February 3, 1956.
Mr. Milton Rosenkranz, attorney for Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor (Mr. Irving Slonim, Mr. Eric Nightingale, and Mr. Daniel B. Berkson, of the New York Bar, of counsel).
Mr. James F. McGovern, Jr., attorney for defendants (Mr. Louis P. Caroselli, of counsel).
PROCTOR, J.S.C.
This is a motion pursuant to R.R. 4:46-5(c) for an order to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- West Virginia Ex Rel. Dyer v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lamb v. SchmittSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Consolidated Rendering Co. v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of MontclairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dutton v. TawesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Delaware River and Bay Authority v. CarelloCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1966
- Del. Riv. & Bay Auth. v. NJ Pub. Emp. ReL Com.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Delaware River & Bay Authority v. CarelloCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1966
- Dutton v. TawesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961