Legal Opinion

Frankle v. Douglas

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Shelbyville. A. S. Marks, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

On the 25th of March, 1871, the firm of Stine & Birmingham, as creditors of G. Cohn, filed their at*477tachment bill in the Chancery Court at Shelbyville,. attaching a small stock of goods previously transferred by Cohn to B. Adam, or B. Adam & Co. A re-plevin bond was executed on behalf of Adam & Co., upon which the present complainants, Henry Frankie, Henry Wolfsen and Henry Hirshburg became sureties, and the goods were released. Two days afterward, the same goods were attached by Hugh Douglas & Co., also creditors of Cohn, by a bill in the same court.. Two of the present complainants, as well…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. McWaters v. HallCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  2. Third Nat. Bank of Nashville v. KeathleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API