Legal Opinion

Yates Bros. v. Garrett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 1907PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from the Probate Court of Noble County; before Ethan Allen, Probate Judge. STATEMENT OE THE ClSE. On the 6th day of September, 1904, R. J. Garrett commenced his action against Yates Brothers, in the probate court of Noble county, for the sum of $990 damages which he alleged he had .suffered by reason of the defendant having permitted certain cattle alleged to have been affected or infected with a contagious and infectious disease, known as “Texas Never,” to stray into…

Read the full summary

Error from the Probate Court of Noble County; before Ethan Allen, Probate Judge. STATEMENT OE THE ClSE. On the 6th day of September, 1904, R. J. Garrett commenced his action against Yates Brothers, in the probate court of Noble county, for the sum of $990 damages which he alleged he had .suffered by reason of the defendant having permitted certain cattle alleged to have been affected or infected with a contagious and infectious disease, known as “Texas Never,” to stray into the pastures of Garrett and communicate to Garrett’s cattle such disease, from which it is alleged Garrett’s cattle…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Irwin, J.:

In the brief and argument of counsel for plaintiff in error two grounds are alleged for a reversal of this case: First, that there was no competent evidence introduced on the trial to show either that Yates Brothers’ cattle were infected with any contagious or infectious disease, or that Garrett’s cattle contracted any such disease, or that Garrett’s cattle died of any such disease; and, second, that the court erred in admitting incompe tent evidence to show the presence of Texas fever in the cattle in question. Both of these assignments can be properly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spring Co. v. EdgarSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Tucker v. Massachusetts Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Walker v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Midland Valley R. Co. v. LarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. State v. JensenOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Rugenstein v. OttenheimerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Grison Oil Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API