Jackson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant appeals her conviction in a trial by the court of sexual solicitation for purposes of prostitution, D.C. Code § 22-2701 (1985 Supp.), on the ground that the trial court erred in denying her motion to dismiss the information based on the government’s waiver of its. right to make an opening statement. We affirm.
After counsel announced that they were ready for trial, the trial judge asked how many witnesses they each had. The prosecutor said he had two witnesses and the defense said he had one. The judge then inquired if the prosecutor wished to make an opening statement. The…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tichnell v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Calhoun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- People v. KurtzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Outlaw v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- District of Columbia v. WhitleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Baldwin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987