Legal Opinion

Mallory Associates, Inc. v. Barving Realty Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Motion to dismiss amended complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

A like motion to dismiss the original complaint was granted, with leave to serve an amended complaint (Mallory Associates v. Barving Realty Co., 193 Misc. 857).

The action is one in conversion to recover the sum of $65,000 deposited by the plaintiff, as tenant, with the corporate defendant, as landlord, under a written lease relating to real property *566situated in Norfolk, Virginia, said deposit being made as security for the full and faithful performance by the tenant of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Archer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Levinson v. ShapiroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Matter of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Malco Trading Corp. v. Mendelson-Silverman, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maidman v. RothCity of New York Municipal Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API