Legal Opinion
Religious Technology Center v. F.A.C.T.NET, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 15, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-B-2143PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, Senior District Judge.
On August 21, 1995 Religious Technology Center (“RTC”), a California non-profit corporation, filed a verified complaint against Lawrence Wollersheim, Robert Penny and F.A.C.T.NET, Inc. (“FACTNET”) for injunc-tive relief and damages for copyright infringement (17 U.S.C. § 501) and trade secrets misappropriation (Colo.Rev.Stat. § 7-74-102 to -110 (1986)).
Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) and (b) in that this is an action for copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 501. Supplemental jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- The Gates Rubber Co. v. Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Joyce L. Walmer v. United States Department of Defense and Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- New Era Publications International, Aps, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carol Publishing Group, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Religious Technology Center v. F.A.C.T.Net, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Lindberg v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Religious Technology Center v. LermaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.