Reese v. McQuilkin
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Vigo Probate Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.
Action of covenant, tried October 9, 1848. The pleadings are of course conformed to the old system. Trial by the Court, on a traverse of the breach. Finding and judgment for the plaintiff below, Mc Quilkin, for 1,352 dollars. There was no motion for a new trial or in arrest of judgment; and no exception to any ruling of the Court.
But on the 4th day of October, 1853, the executor, Reese, prosecutes error. What effect the revised statutes abolishing the writ of error, and limiting appeals to three years, might have on the rights of parties, is not urged in argument, and we make no question upon…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hopkins v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Peters v. McKeonNew York Supreme Court · 1847
- Day v. ChismSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Blackwell v. Board of JusticesIndiana Supreme Court · 1828
3Cited by6 opinions
- Phillips v. ReichertIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- McClure v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Randall v. GhentIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Madden v. Caldwell Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- McNally v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.