Legal Opinion

Brady v. Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 12

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 1932No. 8945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

On December 3,1929, the board of directors of the Hidalgo county water control and improvement district No. 12 employed P. Brady as its purchasing agent and office manager, agreeing to pay him $100 per month for his services as such; thereafter, on February 11, 1930, said board further employed Brady as “assistant manager” of the district, at an “additional salary of $250 per month,” or an aggregate salary of $650 per month as “purchasing agent and office manager” and “assistant manager” ; and thereafter, on March '3, 1930, the board still further employed Brady as tax assessor and collector…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clear Lake City Water Authority v. Kirby Lake Development, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. Brady v. Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement District No. 12Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Cameron County Water Improvement Dist. No. 8 v. Western Metal Mfg. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Moore v. Maverick County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Cameron Cty. W. Imp. v. W. M. Mfg.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API