Legal Opinion
Hryhorijiv v. Winchell
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1943PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcLaughlin, J.
The defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint containing two causes of action upon the ground of insufficiency. The amended complaint alleges that the defendant Winchell stated on the program of the Andrew Jergens Company over the radio station WJZ of the National Broadcasting Company, Inc., the following: “ New Yoek:There is an organization, new to me, in New York, with the title “ Committee for the Promotion of Democracy ”... a lovely lily-white name, to be sure.... A member named Nikifor Grigorieff was recently expelled from the Ukranian Workmen’s Ass ’n — when members decided he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Locke v. GibbonsNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Polakoff v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Lunn v. LittauerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Locke v. GibbonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matherson v. MarchelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Richard R. Riss, Sr. v. Ardith L. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Brown v. W.R.M.A. Broadcasting CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Hyhorijiv v. WinchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Devany v. ShulmanNew York Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.