State v. Shadle
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Parker. Tried below before the Hon. Charles Soward. The indictment charged that Samuel Shadle took from the possession of T. C. Moore “one horse, one saddle, and one bridle, &c., being then the property of the said T. C. Moore, without the consent of the said T. C. Moore.” The exceptions to the indictment were sustained. The opinion sufficiently indicates their character.
1Opinion of the Court
Devine, Associate Justice.
Appellee was indicted in the District Court of Parker county, at the October term, 1872, under the act of May, 1864, (Pas. Dig., art, 2400,) and charged with having taken, with force and arms, and without lawful authority, out of the possession of T. C. Moore, a horse, saddle, and bridle, the property of said Moore.
Defendant excepted to the indictment. The court below sustained the exception and quashed the indictment, from which judgment the State has appealed.
We are sufficiently informed, from the history of the time when this law was passed, of the objects in view…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Clark, Sheriff v. Finley, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Giddings v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- State Board of Insurance v. National Employee Benefit Administrators, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Providence Washington Ins. Co. v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.