In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Per Curiam.
Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1994, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 262 AD2d 702 [1999]).
*1329Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.
Respondent’s…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re BrunetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re BrunetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013